The timing of a ruling by the State Ethics
Commission was perfect, some would say. It was adopted the day before Valentine’s
Day. It came as the result of questions from an unknown attorney to the
Secretary of State’s Lobby Compliance Division which oversees lobbyists in
North Carolina. The question was purely hypothetical, asking if a lobbyist
engaged in sex with an official (member of or staff member of a State
legislator or some other official), it that reportable as a gift. Anyway, this
is such a good story, why leave out any of the details. Here is the text of the
ruling as presented in a letter from the State Ethics Commission to the
Compliance Director of the Secretary of State’s office:
This is
in response to your request for a formal advisory opinion submitted on behalf
of the North Carolina Secretary of State (“the Secretary”). You have asked
whether consensual “sexual favors or sexual acts” between a lobbyist and a
designated individual constitute a gift or “thing of value” that would trigger
the gift ban and reporting requirements of the Lobbying Law and whether those
activities would fall within the definition of “goodwill lobbying” and trigger
the Lobbying Law’s registration obligation. You have made this request in a
general and largely hypothetical context, with little or no supporting facts.
This response must therefore be likewise limited.
This
opinion was adopted by the State Ethics Commission at its February 13, 2015,
meeting.
Section
120C-303(a)(1) of the Lobbying Law restricts a registered lobbyist from giving
a gift to a designated individual unless a gift ban exception applies. “Gift”
is defined as “[a]nything of monetary value given or received without valuable
consideration….” G.S. 138A-3(15). A lobbyist must report certain “reportable
expenditures,” defined to include gifts and “things of value” greater than $10
per day given to a designated individual or immediate family member.
Consensual
sexual relationships do not have monetary value and therefore are not
reportable as gifts or “reportable expenditures made for lobbying” for purposes
of the Lobbying Law’s expenditure reporting provisions. See G.S. 120C-402 and
G.S. 120C-403.2 However, a lobbyist or lobbyist principal’s provision of paid
prostitution services by a third party to a designated individual could constitute
a gift or thing of value, albeit an illegal one, depending on the particular
facts. You have not provided any information that this is an issue in this
situation.
You
have also asked whether consensual sexual relationships between a person and a
designated individual could constitute “goodwill lobbying” and would thereby
trigger the lobbyist registration requirements of the Lobbying Law, G.S.
120C-200. It is unclear why you have asked this question, because in the scant
factual assumptions provided, you state that your question concerns a
relationship between a “lobbyist” and a designated individual, so presumably
the person in question is already registered. Indeed, if there were no lobbyist
involved, there would be no need to even consider the application of the
Lobbying Law’s gift ban or expenditure reporting requirements. However, in
order to avoid the need to further address these issues, the Commission will
respond to your question.
G.S.
120C-200 requires the registration of a “lobbyist,” which is defined as an
“individual who engages in lobbying” and is employed by the lobbyist principal
or receives payment for lobbying. G.S. 120C-100(a)(10). “Lobbying” includes
both direct lobbying and “developing goodwill through communications or
activities, including the building of relationships, with a designated
individual … with the intention of influencing current or future legislative or
executive action.” G.S. 120C-100(a)(9). Thus, if the lobbyist does not receive
payment from the lobbyist principal for engaging in the sexual relationship
which you reference, which the Commission presumes to be the case here, those
activities would not constitute goodwill lobbying and would therefore not
trigger a registration requirement.
In your
December 15, 2014, request for a formal advisory opinion, you requested that
the Commission publish this opinion in an unredacted form; thus you have waived
confidentiality as provided for in N.C.G.S. § 120C-102(d).3
Please
do not hesitate to call the Commission’s staff if you have any questions about
the foregoing formal advisory opinion.
Nice to know that sexual favors by lobbyists to members of
the General Assembly could result in favorable legislation without regard to
the gift reporting law. One might wonder if the State Ethics Commission members or the State Ethics Commission staff can apply the ruling to themselves. No accusations; just thinking aloud, wondering. Click those links to get to know the SEC members and the SEC staff.
--------------------
Dictionary.com word of the
day
polymathy (noun) [puh-lim-uh-thee]: learning in many fields; encyclopedic knowledge
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave your comment here: